Valuation Lens — August 11, 2026
China leads relative value; energy and U.S. equities carry the clearest valuation premiums, while crypto’s discount has lower model confidence.
Every asset class is indexed so today’s market price equals 100. A median fair value of 112 means the model puts fair value 12% above the current price; 93 means 7% below it. Modeled returns are distributions, not forecasts.
The preferred one-year hurdle is 4.04% on DGS1, with positive real yields keeping discount-rate discipline important across risk assets.
- 10y Treasury
- 4.7%
- 10y real
- 2.4%
Cheap to expensive
Ranked by valuation score. Positive means the model sees value below the market price — the opposite convention to a trend score, so the labels are always shown alongside.
- +1.0Somewhat cheap
- Median fair value
- 110.097.0–127.0
- Upside to median
- +10.0%
- 1y modeled
- +9.5%-10.0% to 30.0%
- vs Treasury
- +5.5%
- +0.7Somewhat cheap
- Median fair value
- 105.096.0–121.0
- Upside to median
- +5.0%
- 1y modeled
- +8.5%-8.0% to 26.0%
- vs Treasury
- +4.5%
- CryptoBTC-USD+0.7Somewhat cheap
- Median fair value
- 112.088.0–152.0
- Upside to median
- +12.0%
- 1y modeled
- +14.0%-30.0% to 105.0%
- vs Treasury
- +10.0%
- +0.4Somewhat cheap
- Median fair value
- 103.096.0–117.0
- Upside to median
- +3.0%
- 1y modeled
- +7.5%-6.0% to 21.0%
- vs Treasury
- +3.5%
- +0.1Fair
- Median fair value
- 101.095.0–115.0
- Upside to median
- +1.0%
- 1y modeled
- +7.0%-5.0% to 18.0%
- vs Treasury
- +3.0%
- MetalsGLD+0.1Fair
- Median fair value
- 101.091.0–126.0
- Upside to median
- +1.0%
- 1y modeled
- +6.0%-10.0% to 28.0%
- vs Treasury
- +2.0%
- Fixed IncomeBND-0.1Fair
- Median fair value
- 100.098.0–103.0
- Upside to median
- 0.0%
- 1y modeled
- +4.7%-1.0% to 8.5%
- vs Treasury
- +0.7%
- Real EstateVNQ-0.4Somewhat expensive
- Median fair value
- 97.092.0–112.0
- Upside to median
- -3.0%
- 1y modeled
- +6.5%-7.0% to 21.0%
- vs Treasury
- +2.5%
- -1.0Somewhat expensive
- Median fair value
- 94.087.0–105.0
- Upside to median
- -6.0%
- 1y modeled
- +5.5%-7.0% to 15.0%
- vs Treasury
- +1.5%
- US EquitiesSPY-1.3Expensive
- Median fair value
- 95.090.0–102.0
- Upside to median
- -5.0%
- 1y modeled
- +6.0%-8.0% to 16.0%
- vs Treasury
- +2.0%
- EnergyUSO-1.6Expensive
- Median fair value
- 89.078.0–100.0
- Upside to median
- -11.0%
- 1y modeled
- +2.5%-18.0% to 25.0%
- vs Treasury
- -1.5%
Scores run −3 to +3: −3 is very expensive against modeled fair value, +3 very cheap. Positive means undervalued.
“1y modeled” shows the median of a scenario distribution with its 10th-to-90th percentile range beneath. These are model outputs under stated assumptions, not predictions, and the range is as important as the midpoint.
Where the market sits inside modeled fair value
Each curve is the model's full range of fair-value outcomes. The solid marker is today's price; the dashed line is the median of the distribution.
China & Hong Kong Equities
Today’s price sits at the 33.3th percentile of modeled fair value — 67% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
Emerging Markets Equities
Today’s price sits at the 38.1th percentile of modeled fair value — 62% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
Crypto
Today’s price sits at the 38.1th percentile of modeled fair value — 62% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Axis widened to 10–270 to show the full modeled range; the published renderer axis of 50–220 would clip this distribution’s tails.
Europe Equities
Today’s price sits at the 42.9th percentile of modeled fair value — 57% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
Japan Equities
Today’s price sits at the 47.6th percentile of modeled fair value — 52% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
Metals
Today’s price sits at the 47.6th percentile of modeled fair value — 52% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Axis widened to 30–220 to show the full modeled range; the published renderer axis of 50–220 would clip this distribution’s tails.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
Fixed Income
Today’s price sits at the 52.4th percentile of modeled fair value — 48% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
Real Estate
Today’s price sits at the 57.1th percentile of modeled fair value — 43% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
Developed Pacific Equities
Today’s price sits at the 66.7th percentile of modeled fair value — 33% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
US Equities
Today’s price sits at the 71.4th percentile of modeled fair value — 29% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Energy
Today’s price sits at the 76.2th percentile of modeled fair value — 24% of modeled scenarios put fair value above the market.
Axis widened to 30–220 to show the full modeled range; the published renderer axis of 50–220 would clip this distribution’s tails.
Not a calibrated probability — no regime-matched history was available, so this is the model’s own scenario weighting shown next to the unconditional historical rate.
Sources15
- 1
- 2U.S. Stock Markets 1871-PresentRobert J. Shiller / ShillerData
- 3iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI)BlackRock iShares
- 4iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ)BlackRock iShares
- 5iShares MSCI Australia ETF (EWA)BlackRock iShares
- 6
- 7Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK)Vanguard
- 8
- 9Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ)Vanguard
- 10EIA expects highest natural gas inventories in a decade heading into winterU.S. Energy Information Administration
- 11Gold Demand Trends: Q2 2026World Gold Council
- 12A Market in RepairGlassnode
- 131-Year Treasury Rate (DGS1)Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis / FRED
- 1410-Year Treasury Rate (DGS10)Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis / FRED
- 1510-Year Treasury Inflation-Indexed Security, Constant Maturity (DFII10)Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis / FRED
- Methodology
- cxpw_valuation_lens_v3.4
- Schema version
- 3.4.0
- Run ID
- vl_20260811_180704-et
This content is for informational and educational purposes only and is not financial advice. All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.
