Both lenses score −3 to +3, in different senses: on Market Lens, +3 is strongly supportive conditions; on Valuation Lens, +3 is very cheap against modeled fair value.
Market Lens
- Trend
- Sideways
- Volatility
- Normal
- Vs trend
- Near trend
US Consumer Discretionary Sector is in a sideways with normal volatility and is near trend relative to trend. Sideways, wait-and-see. The strongest directly mapped News & Events force is Inflation stays sticky.
Full evidence →Valuation Lens
- Median fair value
- 83.1market = 100
- 1y modeled return
- -0.1%
US Consumer Discretionary Sector inherits the asset-class valuation as a proxy only; no security-specific fair-value model was independently estimated.
Full distribution →Risk profile
- Annualised volatility
- 24.1%
- Max drawdown
- -39.7%
- 5y return (CAGR)
- 5.4%
Realized statistics from five years of monthly total returns. Historical risk is context, not a forecast.
Reading the two together
Rising, but richly pricedTechnical conditions are favorable while the model puts fair value below today’s price. Trend-following and valuation disciplines point in opposite directions — the tension is real, not a data error.
Supporting and opposing conditions
Supportive
- None recorded.
Opposing
- Direction remains range-bound.
- Price remains below the 200-day average.